Original article below:
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolutio?bffb
"Bill Nye, are you influencing the minds of children in a positive way?"
Yes. Yes he is. If we consider a "positive way" to mean "a way in which they will provide some useful function in society" then yes, he is most definitely influencing children's minds positively. You sir, are the first cunt on the list.
"Are you scared of a Divine creator?"
Ultimately, a lot of Christians accept the Creationism is a bag of horseshit anyway, and they still believe in god; this question is pointless and has nothing to do with the debate.
Allow me to retort with "Are you scared of dying, knowing that you will be judged for your actions in life and most likely sent to hell?". For your cuntish ignorance, you will most certainly end up there.
"Is it completely illogical that the earth was created mature? i.e. trees created with rings... Adam created as an adult..."
Yes, in the same way that it would be completely illogical to assume that just willing something to be true will make it a fact. In all honesty, I can't fault anything about this except for the basis of the belief itself - trees could be created with rings and Adam could have been created as an adult... but only if you first accept that all of biological science came into being 6000 years ago, and conveniently showed evidence of life millions of years previously... you know... just to route out us "non believers"
"Does not the second law of thermodynamics disprove evolution?"
No, it fucking doesn't. The second law of thermodynamics is "In a closed system, all things tend towards entropy". Entropy is the scientific term for disorder. It basically states that in a system with no outside influence, the structure of atoms and molecules will become more and more disordered over time. If you build a sandcastle on a beach, it will eventually turn into a pile of sand.
Conveniently forgetting parts of this law have been a staple comeback of creationists for years. "In a closed system" refers to a system with no outside influence. For a start, we have a fucking sun. Cunt.
"How do you explain a sunset if their is no god?"
Hang on, creationists know that the earth spins on it's axis right? Really? Shit. This is worse than I thought. Someone call NASA.
Aside from bad grammar, this is the most ignorant bullshit I've read yet. A sunset is beautiful, we get that, but it's just as beautiful for non-believers who understand it's beauty scientifically. If your only argument is that the earth is aesthetically pleasing, you should go spend more time collecting nice shiny shells on the beach, and less time trying to make a coherent point you cuntwaffle.
"If the Big Bang Theory is true and taught as science along with evolution, why do the laws of thermodynamics debunk said theories?"
There is nothing in the laws of thermodynamics that debunks the Big Bang Theory and as i have already pointed out, the argument against the 2nd law allowing evolution is bullshit too. I really have fuck all else to say on this one, it just stinks of amateur scientist. Someone who has read one article on Natural News and thinks that's the way the world works.
"What about Noetics?"
What about it? It's a branch of metaphysics, it isn't science. Cunt.
"Where do you derive objective meaning in life?"
As far as I know, the meaning of life according to Christianity is simply to live it. Isn't that the same thing everyone does? For fuck sake, decide for yourself what your life is to you, and live it the way you want to. If everyone got their meaning of life from the same fucking book we'd be surrounded by clones.
"If God did not create everything, how did the first single-celled organism originate? By Chance?"
"The first single-celled organism"... don't those 5 words prove that she doesn't understand creationism anyway? Isn't a belief that single-celled organisms EVOLVED into life part of EVOLUTION?
And yes. By chance. That's kinda the point.
"I believe in the Big Bang Theory... God said it and BANG it happened!"
Well done you, have a fucking cookie.
"Why do evolutionists/secularists/humanists/non-God believing people reject the idea of their being a creator God but embrace the concept of intelligent design from aliens or other extra-terrestrial sources?"
I've never met anyone who thought that we originated from aliens. I want whatever this fucking guy is smoking.
"There is no in between... the only one found has been Lucy and there are only a few pieces of the hundreds necessary for an "official proof""
If you want proof, why the fuck are you a creationist you silly bitch...
"Does metamorphosis help support evolution?"
Yes it does. The current theory is that insects before pupation are in an embryonic state, where they feed to gain the necessary body mass and nutrients required to undergo the change.
There is nothing in evolution that metamorphosis disproves, but granted it is still a grey area. Still less of a grey area than creationism though.
"If evolution is a theory (like creationism or the Bible) why then is Evolution taught as fact?"
Because it's based on what we observe around us, and what we see evidence of in the past... it isn't based on a book of questionable origin.
Also, why are you referring to the Bible as a theory?
"Because science by definition is a "theory" - not testable, observable, nor repeatable, why do you object to creationism or intelligent design being taught in school?"
Ohhhh no. Not repeatable? How the fuck do you think we build advanced machinery and computers if science is "not repeatable"? How can we see the movement of stars and planets if science is "not observable"? How did the LHC find evidence of the Higgs Boson if our results are "not testable"?
You are the worst. You are awful. Get the fuck out. We don't want creationism being taught in schools because we're worried kids will turn out like you.
"What mechanism has science discovered that evidences an increase of genetic information see in any genetic mutation or evolutionary process?"
Bill explained this in his debate. If you take a fish that reproduces either asexually or sexually, the ones that produce sexually carry fewer diseases and parasites because their genetic code is more diverse. The genetic information may not increase, it simply adapts to overcome problems. The biggest problems facing all life, especially humans, are not predatory; they are diseases, viruses, parasites... all of these can be explained via evolution, but are conveniently glossed over by creationists.
"What purpose do you think you are here for if you do not believe in salvation?"
To live. We are here to live; the same reason you are here you quack. Some of us don't need a book to guide us in life because we are more than capable of making our own decisions. Seriously, intelligent life? Are you trully intelligent if you spew this kind of shit? Do you wake up on a morning and forget to brush your teeth if someone doesn't point you towards the sink? Derp derp derp.
"Why have we found only 1 "Lucy", when we have found more than 1 of everything else?"
Seriously, compare the size of a dinosaur to a human. Now look at the bones discovered belonging to "lucy". There is very little left. We may have discovered other bones, but not announced them to the public because we have no real proof of origin. Lucy was the result of decades of hard work by scientists, and was a fairly recent find. What we haven't found yet, doesn't disprove anything; it certainly doesn't mean we won't find more in future.
"Can you believe in "the big bang" without faith?"
I'm an atheist, and I believe it because I see the evidence for it. Point proven bitch.
I think he got this question backwards considering that the origin of the universe according to Creationism was not a big bang... so if you have faith in Creationism you shouldn't believe the big bang right? Yeah. He believes it. What the fuck is he? Deluded.
"How can you look at the world and not believe someone created/thought of it? It's amazing!!!"
Oh yeah, look at all that delightful famine. How fucking lovely.
Get bent.
"Relating to the big bang theory... where did the exploding star come from?"
There was no exploding star. The big bang was not an exploding star. That would be a supernova, genius. Seriously, if you don't even understand the point you're trying to argue against, why the hell would you speak up at all?
"If we come from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?"
They are not the same monkeys.
THEY ARE NOT THE SAME FUCKING MONKEYS, TIT. AGAIN, ARGUING A POINT HAVING NOT EVEN BOTHERED TO TRY AND READ UP ON THE THEORY YOU'RE TRYING TO DISPROVE. FUCK OFF. THE LOT OF YOU, FUCK OFF YOU IGNORANT BASTARDS.
And that concludes today's episode of rage. Next week, we will be disproving scientology by dangling $20 notes in front of Tom Cruise.
Since writing this, another article has been released documenting the rebuttal from the Evolutionary camp; enjoy!
http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/messages-from-creationists-to-people-who-believe-in-evolutio?bffb
No comments:
Post a Comment